Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Jeremy Quinn, Jr. v. Dave Yost, et al
as 22-3788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY J. QUINN, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVE YOST, Ohio Attorney General, individually and in his official capacity and JULIA R. BATES, Head Prosecutor for Lucas County, OH Court of Common Pleas, individually and in her official capacity
Quinn v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00661
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J. Quinn, Jr.
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe and Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Quinn v. Yost et al
as 3:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J. Quinn, Jr.
Defendant:
Dave Yost and Julia R. Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lopez Pena v. Cole et al
as 1:2019cv10276
Defendant:
Jay Wineberg, David N. Keley, Terry Cole and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Lopez Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. State of South Carolina et al
as 7:2019cv01790
Defendant:
State of South Carolina and County of Spartanburg
Plaintiff:
Cecil J Quinn, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Retort et al
as 4:2018cv02615
Defendant:
B. Kilmer, Mr. F. Retort, Justin Griffiths and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J. Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Bowen
as 3:2018cv02614
Respondent:
Warden Richard A. Bowen, Jr.
Petitioner:
Jeremy J. Quinn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Salgado v. New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision et al
as 9:2018cv00495
Defendant:
Lee, Dr. Bergren, J. Colvin and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Salgado, Jr., Abdul Ali Karim-Rashid, Vincent Delgado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremy Quinn, Jr. v. Eshem, et al
as 16-3272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY J. QUINN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. ESHEM, Correctional Officer, et al.
Cowart v. Quinn et al
as 2:2015cv04252
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Cowart
Defendant:
J Quinn and Sgt Cozolli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
