Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Timmons v. Edmonds et al
as 1:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Brandon Timmons
Defendant:
C.O. Edmonds, J. Simpson, C.O. Warford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timmons v. Issac et al
as 1:2020cv02035
Defendant:
CO1 Issac, CO1 Edmonds, Rhonda Tomcavage and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Timmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PANDOLFO et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05824
Plaintiff:
FRANK PANDOLFO , VICTOR MANUEL PARGAS , ZAIDA M. PARKER and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMPSON v. ASTRUE
as 3:2012cv00055
Plaintiff:
DONNA J. SIMPSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Andre Jacobs v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 11-2871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, THOMAS MCCONNELL, CAROL A. SCIRE and others
Andre Jacobs v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 11-2832
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ANDRE JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, ALLEN LYNCH, ROBERT BITTNER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS MCCONNELL, CAROL A. SCIRE and GREGORY GIDDENS
SIMPSON et al v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv33217
Plaintiff:
CLAIBON J SIMPSON, SR. , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Andre Jacobs v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 10-1439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, DAVID MCCOY, THOMAS MCCONNELL and others
USA v. Donna Simpson
as 09-3319
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DONNA J. SIMPSON
SIMPSON et al v. CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv79888
Plaintiff:
EARL J. SIMPSON, EARL J. SIMPSON, BARBARA SIMPSON and others
Defendant:
CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
