Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Paul Johnson v. Thuddy, et al
as 23-15167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THUDDY, MD., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D., L. W. ROHLFING, MD and others
Paul Johnson v. Thuddy, et al
as 22-16116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THUDDY, M.D., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D., L. W. ROHLFING, M.D. and others
Paul Johnson v. Joseph Chudy, et al
as 22-15050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH CHUDY, M.D., THUDDY, M.D., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D. and others
Paul Johnson v. J. Beard, et al
as 21-16846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director/Secretary of CDCR, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, Warden of HDSP, J. PRICE, Warden, DVI and others
Paul Johnson v. J. Beard, et al
as 21-16368
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director/Secretary of CDCR, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, Warden of HDSP, J. PRICE, Warden, DVI and others
Paul Johnson v. Joseph Chudy, et al
as 21-16110
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director of CDCR, A. TRAQUINA, M.D., CMO, NORMA ACQUVA, M.D., HCM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Paul Johnson v. D. Runnels, et al
as 21-15888
Defendant / Appellee:
Y. P. CHEN, MD at CSP-SOL, BINOYE NAKU, L. B. BROWN, Jr., MD at CDCR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Paul Johnson v. Mahmoud, et al
as 20-16498
Defendant:
J. PRICE, N. ACQUVA, F. KREITLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
G. SWARTHOUT, Y. P. CHEN, MAHMOUD, MD at CSP-SOL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Lopez v. Beard et al
as 4:2015cv05160
Plaintiff:
Jose Lopez
Defendant:
J. A. Beard, C. E. Ducart, R. Reich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Lord et al
as 5:2015cv03528
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jones
Defendant:
P. Lord, W.L. Muniz and J. A. Beard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
