Cases 31 - 40 of 43
v. Anderson et al
as 7:2011cv01954
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Anderson
Defendant:
Bloom Hochberg & Co., P.C. and Irwin Hochberg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Anderson v. United States of America
as 11-743
Petitioner - Appellant:
Anthony J. Anderson
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Anderson et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2011cv00729
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Anderson and Becky Anderson
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Counter_claimant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Counter_defendant:
Becky Anderson and Richard J. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDowall v. Metropolitan Detention Correctional Center et al
as 1:2009cv00695
Plaintiff:
Maurice C. McDowall
Defendant:
Metropolitan Detention Correctional Center, Guimond, B. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDowall v. MDC et al
as 1:2009cv00246
Plaintiff:
Maurice C. McDowall
Defendant:
MDC, Guimond, B. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson et al v. Emerson Power Transmission Corporation et al
as 5:2008cv01016
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Anderson, Kathleen M. O'Connor, Christopher Babcox and others
Defendant:
Emerson Power Transmission Corporation, Emerson Power Transmission Corporation, Emerson Power Transmission Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Demenna v. Buck Scientific, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv06240
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Demenna
Defendant:
Buck Scientific, Inc., Robert J Anderson and Eric Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Khalil v. Laird et al
as 1:2007cv01210
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Khalil
Defendant:
Paul M. Laird, Justin Andrews, R. Schoenfelder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
