Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Ward v. Biden et al
as 1:2023cv08792
Plaintiff:
Kareem Ward
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Grand Lodge of Free Accepted Mason and Williams J. Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ryder v. Czajka et al
as 1:2023cv01102
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ryder
Defendant:
Paul Czajka, The Office of the District Attorney of Columbia County, Jason C. Finn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community Supervision et al
as 1:2019cv01529
Defendant:
Thomas Diina, Richard E. Sise, Jeremiah J. McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community Supervision et al
as 1:2019cv09128
Defendant:
Thomas Diina, Hon. Christopher J. Burns, Tina M. Stanford and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv06506
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv06505
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Acevedo et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11422
Plaintiff:
Robert Robertson, Catalino Robles, John Harty and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Mims v. Feroleto et al
as 1:2017cv00894
Plaintiff:
Amir Rashad Mims
Defendant:
Paula L. Feroleto, Christopher J. Burns, John L. Michalski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2016cv06103
Plaintiff:
James Nelson
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Sandra Doorley, Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2016cv06104
Plaintiff:
James Nelson
Defendant:
City of Rochester , Sandra Doorley , Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
