Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DAVENPORT v. MILLER et al
as 2:2024cv02364
Petitioner:
AUSTIN R. DAVENPORT
Respondent:
ANDY D. MILLER, DANEL J. CABLE, ESRA BETUL OZTURK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cable v. Madison County Probation & Parole Department et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00660
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Cable
Defendant:
Madison County Probation & Parole Department, Bridget McGraw, Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cable v. Madison County Probation & Parole Department et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Cable
Defendant:
Madison County Probation & Parole Department, Bridget McGraw, Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leo Olguin v. J. Cable et al
as 2:2020cv10684
Defendant:
R. Day and J. Cable
Plaintiff:
Mr. Leo Olguin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Ybarra et al
as 1:2015cv00723
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wayne Oliver
Defendant:
G. Ybarra , C. Wallace , R. Cano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Ybarra et al
as 1:2015at00391
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wayne Oliver
Defendant:
G. Ybarra , C. Wallace , R. Cano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bivins v. Hill et al
as 2:2015cv00748
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bivins
Defendant:
R. Hill, S. Cox, N. Hayward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivan Lee Matthews v. Liles et al
as 1:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
Ivan Lee Matthews
Defendant:
R. Liles, J. Sherrett and J. Cable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cable v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00120
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Cable
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, Billy Mitchem and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
