Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Campbell v. City of Binghamton, NY et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
David J. Campbell
Defendant:
City of Binghamton, NY, Jared M. Kraham, Binghamton Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Halberstam v. AgroFresh Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02389
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Halberstam
Defendant:
AgroFresh Solutions, Inc., John Atkin, Robert J. Campbell and others
Hinds et al v. City of New York, New York
as 1:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
Tamara N. Hinds, Lisa D. Blango, Sheila R. Williams and others
Defendant:
City of New York, New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Campbell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv06570
Plaintiff:
Kathy Campbell and Kathy J. Campbell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wunderlich Securities, Inc. et al v. Dominick & Dickerman LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03507
Petitioner:
Gary Wunderlich and Wunderlich Securities, Inc.
Respondent:
Michael J. Campbell and Dominick & Dickerman LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
McCain v. Shelby et al
as 6:2016cv06624
Plaintiff:
Adrian McCain
Defendant:
T. Shelby, J. Campbell and S. Echert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02597
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06570
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
