Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Clark-El v. Pharmacy Technician, Ms. Lisa et al
as 1:2022cv02231
Plaintiff:
Hammel J. Clark-El
Defendant:
Pharmacy Technician, Ms. Lisa, Pharmacy Technician, Ms. Christina, Dr. Salin Nhean Nhean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Iser et al
as 1:2022cv01691
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
Major W. Iser, Lt. Thomas, Commissioner O. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2021cv02642
Petitioner:
Hammel J. Clark
Respondent:
Thomas Wolfe and Brian E. Frosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Onorio et al
as 8:2021cv01781
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Clark
Defendant:
Dane Onorio and Montgomery County Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. Dills et al
as 1:2021cv00833
Defendant:
James Dills, J. Emmet Burke, Jennifer Schiffer and others
Plaintiff:
Hammel J. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Haughie v. U.S. et al
as 8:2021cv00101
Defendant:
W. Hill, Security Guard Patterson, B. Swan-Mace and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Haughie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Clark v. Montgomery County Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv01194
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Clark
Defendant:
Montgomery County Police Department, Montgomery County Correctional Facility, C.O. M. Mitchum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Stewart-El v. Berry et al
as 8:2019cv02823
Defendant:
Troy D. Berry, John A. Riffle, Jerome R. Spenser and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Adel Stewart-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Locklear v. MD Dept. Public Safety Correctional Services et al
as 8:2018cv00433
Plaintiff:
Roger Locklear
Defendant:
MD Dept. Public Safety Correctional Services, Richard J. Graham, Bradley O. Buttler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Beeman et al
as 8:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
Hammel J. Clark
Defendant:
Steven Beeman, R. J. Graham, Jr., A. Cartwright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
