Cases 1 - 9 of 9
McKee v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
Jamey McKee
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, L. Harry, G. Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cuney v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cuney
Defendant:
W. Spaulding, E. Rickard, M. Riebsome and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Santore v. Northumberland County et al
as 4:2022cv00671
Plaintiff:
Robert Francis Santore
Defendant:
Northumberland County, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Jamie Bressi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galutia et al v. County et al
as 1:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Dannelle Galutia
Defendant:
Columbia County, George Nye, Officer Lorson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAY v. BRADLEY et al
as 3:2020cv00047
Defendant:
COUNSELOR M. NAGLIC, CASE MANAGER J. SPEILVOGEL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GORAL and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
THOMAS v. SALEM COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2017cv05252
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL THOMAS
Defendant:
SALEM COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, J. PORTER, E. WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. C.F.C.F. WARDEN et al
as 2:2016cv01606
Plaintiff:
SHAHEED WILLIAMS
Defendant:
C.F.C.F. WARDEN, BELLO MAYJOR, J. DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2010cv01126
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BURNS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AT S.C.I. CHESTER, S.C.I. LAUREL HIGHLANDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MULLINS v. CRIPPEN / MULLINS et al
as 2:2007cv01029
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MULLINS
Defendant:
SUSANN CRIPPEN / MULLINS, PAULA HOWARD and J DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
