Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Topper Partners I, LLC v. The Estate of Jens Dalsgaard and John Doe et al
as 2:2015ms00095
Defendant:
Constellation Asset Advisors, Inc, Guardian for J. Doe John Doe, EraStar Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Topper Partners I, LLC
In Re: Jomo Williams
as 14-3115
Petitioner:
Jomo Williams
Respondent:
C.J.S., United States Postal Service, Federal Election Committee and others
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv12374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lipin v. Sawyer
as 12-2734
Petitioner:
Joan C. Lipin
Respondent:
Dana A. Sawyer, J. Doe, Nos. 1-5, being the fictional first and last names of the individuals who conspired with the trespasser and David E. Hunt, who engaged in the tortious actions from which sustantial revenue has been and/or is expected to be derived, that have caused injury to the plaintiff
-FFM J. Doe et al v. Astellas Pharma, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv07695
Defendant:
Astellas Pharma U.S., Inc., Astellas Pharma, Inc., Astellas U.S. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Commonwealth of Virginia, District of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States v. Alvaro Jerez-Ravaric
as 11-3448
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Alvaro Rene Jerez-Ravaric, also known as J. Doe 522, also known as Rene Perez
In Re: Joan Lipin
as 11-3579
Petitioner:
Joan C. Lipin
Respondent:
Dana A. Sawyer, J. Doe, Nos. 1-5, being the fictional first and last names of the individuals who conspired with the trespasser, David E. Hunt, who engaged in the tortious actions from which sustantial revenue has been and/or is expected to be derived, that have caused injury to the plaintiff and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
