Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Fiege v. MEnD Correctional Care et al
as 0:2023cv00602
Plaintiff:
Jared Fiege
Defendant:
MEnD Correctional Care, Todd Leonard, Saint Louis County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leask v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2022cv02481
Plaintiff:
Ewan Leask
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis and Officer J Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Leask et al
as 4:2022cv02480
Defendant:
Ewan Leask, City of Minneapolis and Officer J Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Leask v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 4:2022cv02481
Plaintiff:
Ewan Leask
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis and Officer J Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Christopher v. Dakota County et al
as 0:2022cv02267
Plaintiff:
Tywan G. Christopher
Defendant:
Dakota County, Sloane McPherson, Donald Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Hennepin County et al
as 0:2022cv02266
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Watson
Defendant:
Hennepin County, Nick Peterson and J. Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyer v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2021cv02298
Plaintiff:
Scott H. Meyer
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis, J. Does 1-5 and Police Officers J. Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Rice County et al
as 0:2020cv01985
Defendant:
Sartor, J. Does 1-5, Malecha and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Allen King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doherty v. St. Louis County et al
as 0:2020cv00385
Defendant:
St. Louis County and Correctional Officers J. Does 1-2
Plaintiff:
Steven Doherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fiege v. County of St. Louis et al
as 0:2019cv02553
Defendant:
Deputy Gerard Gagnon, Sergeant Brandon Silgjord, Deputy Mark Haselow and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Fiege
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
