Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Kelly et al v. The State of Indiana et al
as 3:2022cv00595
Plaintiff:
Jason Kelly, Myka Kelly, A. S. and others
Defendant:
The State of Indiana, Sandra Sell, Brandy Shaver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03778
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02327
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Waller et al v. Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv00223
Plaintiff:
Catherine Waller and Abena Andoh
Defendant:
City of Chicago , J E Morlock, K W Flaherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
State of Wisconsin, et al v. Crystal M, Incorporated, et al
as 11-1710
Plaintiff:
B. A., J. J., J. E. and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF WISCONSIN
Defendant:
BRIAN J. BOHLMANN, in his individual capacity
Defendant - Appellant:
CRYSTAL M. INC., formerly known as MEDICAL DOCTOR ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
Brian Bohlmann, et al v. State of Wisconsin
as 11-1672
Plaintiff:
B. A., J. J., J. E. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BRIAN J. BOHLMANN, in his individual capacity
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF WISCONSIN
Wright v. City of Chicago, Illinois et al
as 1:2009cv01390
Plaintiff:
Ardifine Wright and Ardifine Wright
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Illinois, J. E. Tuman and J. O. Tamez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Powell v. City of Chicago, Illinois et al
as 1:2009cv00070
Plaintiff:
Bruce Powell and Bruce Powell
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Illinois, S. C. Giannini and J. E. Brill
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
