Cases 1 - 10 of 68
PRONIN v. TUSSEY et al
as 2:2015cv00061
Defendant:
BASINGER, J. F. CARAWAY, MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
DMITRY PRONIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GROSS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv00059
Respondent:
J. F. CARAWAY
Petitioner:
ANDREW GROSS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROWN v. DR. WILSON et al
as 1:2015cv00224
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LYNN BROWN, Jr.
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS STAFF, J. F. CARAWAY, DR. MICKEY CHO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FAULKNER v. CARAWAY
as 2:2015cv00042
Respondent:
J. F. CARAWAY
Petitioner:
JAMES A. FAULKNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STEWART v. CARAWAY
as 2:2015cv00038
Respondent:
J. F. CARAWAY
Petitioner:
JESSE J. STEWART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
REED v. LARIVA et al
as 2:2015cv00005
Respondent:
J. F. CARAWAY, CHARLES DANIELS, EDGE and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HOWARD REED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COLLIER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv00365
Defendant:
ALL MEMBERS OF THE UTILIZATION REVIEW COMMITTEE, T. BAILEY, T. BIXLER and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON COLLIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HALL v. SAMUELS et al
as 2:2014cv00348
Defendant:
D. ALLRED, BOND HOLDERS/ISSUERS DOES 1-5, J. F. CARAWAY and others
Plaintiff:
MARC PIERRE HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv00310
Defendant:
BALLARD, BOOKER, BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
O'NEAL v. CARAWAY
as 2:2014cv00304
Respondent:
J. F. CARAWAY
Petitioner:
RALPH T. O'NEAL , III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
