Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Steven Riddick v. Barry Mullins
as 23-6670
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN RIDDICK
Defendant / Appellee:
BARRY MULLINS, Correctional Officer and Z. M. MANNON, Sergeant
Defendant:
JEFFERY B. KISER, Warden, LARRY COLLINS, Unit Manager, C. MESSER, Correctional Officer and others
David Meyers v. Walter Swiney
as 23-6402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
WALTER SWINEY, Unit Manager, D. C. STALLARD and M. L. COUNTS
Defendant:
U. S. POSTAL SERVICE, J. GIBSON, P. SYLKES and others
Steven Riddick v. Barry Mullins
as 23-6392
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN RIDDICK
Defendant / Appellee:
BARRY MULLINS, Correctional Officer and Z. M. MANNON, Sergeant
Defendant:
JEFFERY B. KISER, Warden, LARRY COLLINS, Unit Manager, C. MESSER, Correctional Officer and others
David Meyers v. B. Dye
as 22-6785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
B. DYE, R. BISHOP, S. YOUNG and others
Meyers v. Dye et al
as 7:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
B. Dye, R. Bishop, S. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. B. Dye
as 21-6637
Defendant / Appellee:
ART RIP, J. BENTLEY, F. STANLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7262
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DANIELS, J. ELY, A. W. COMBS and others
Defendant:
JAMES JONES, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7238
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, J. GILLIAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7246
Defendant / Appellee:
I. O. RIVERO, I. O. HARRIS, J. ELY and others
Defendant:
JULIA C. DUDLEY, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-6643
Defendant / Appellee:
W. SWINEY, J. ELY, D. BAKER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
