Cases 1 - 10 of 48
(PC) Petillo v. J. Gallagher, et al.
as 1:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Isaiah J. Petillo
Defendant:
J. Gallagher and J. Fugate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gebrezgie v. Phillips et al
as 1:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
Yohannes Gebrezgie
Defendant:
K. Phillips, K. Matta, V. Marmolejo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gebrezgie v. Phillips et al
as 1:2021cv01626
Plaintiff:
Yohannes Gebrezgie
Defendant:
K. Phillips, K. Matta, V. Marmolejo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Walker v. Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv02243
Plaintiff:
G. Daniel Walker
Defendant:
J. Medina, California Department of Corrections, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sadler v. Mesa et al
as 5:2020cv00511
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Sadler and Salah Aldin Yussuf Ibn Ayyub
Defendant:
Florida Clinical Laboratories, Inc, Louis A. Vargas, FNU Hugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hammler v. State of California et al
as 2:2020cv00884
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, M. Gamboa, Pleshchuk and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Mills v. Clarke et al
as 1:2020cv00498
Defendant:
Shaka Senghor, J. Manangan, R. Juarez and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Ray Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickey v. Suffolk Superior Court et al
as 1:2020cv10672
Defendant:
Suffolk Co. District Attorney's Office, Suffolk Superior Court, Judge Jennifer C. Boal and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas I. Hickey, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Smith v. Diaz, et al.
as 1:2020cv00349
Defendant:
D. Clark, M. Lirones, E. Rollins and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Diaz et al
as 4:2020cv01557
Defendant:
D. Clark, M. Lirones, E. Rollins and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
