Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Merritt v. Hicks et al
as 9:2023cv01465
Defendant:
John Doe C, J. Hicks, John Doe A and others
Plaintiff:
Elisha Merritt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Siler v. Hicks et al
as 1:2021cv00807
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Siler
Defendant:
Officer J. Hicks, Officer Kirk, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritt v. Hicks
as 20-3522
Defendant / Appellee:
Carl J. Koenigsmann, Deputy Commissioner Chief Medical Officer, J. Hicks, Sergeant, Governeur Correctional Facility, Dr. S. Ramineni, Mohawk Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
John Doe "E", Correctional Officer, Governeur Correctional Facility, Lieutenant Theriault, Acting Captain, Gouverneur Correctional Facility, John Doe "A", Correctional Officer, Governeur Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Elijha Merritt
Merritt v. Theriault et al
as 9:2018cv01067
Defendant:
John Doe "E", John Doe "D", Nurse Jane Doe "A" and others
Plaintiff:
Elijha Merritt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dotson v. Cleveland et al
as 9:2017cv00090
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Dotson
Defendant:
S. Cleveland, J. Hicks, Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. McArdle
as 9:2014cv00323
Petitioner:
Quentin J. Hicks
Respondent:
Barry McArdle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hicks v. Oakes et al
as 9:2013cv01254
Plaintiff:
Quentin J. Hicks
Defendant:
Gregory Oakes, Reuel A. Todd, Thomas A. Beilein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Buitron et al
as 6:2012cv01841
Plaintiff:
Quentin J. Hicks
Defendant:
Steven C. Buitron, Gregory Oaks, Donald H. Dodd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. LeClair
as 9:2007cv00613
Petitioner:
Louis J. Hicks
Respondent:
Darwin LeClair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
