Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Hicks et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv07331
Plaintiff:
Lavonne J. Hicks and Steven Hicks
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05761
Plaintiff:
Doreen J. Hicks
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2013cv00655
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthia J Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hicks v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv04843
Plaintiff:
Loretta J. Hicks
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HICKS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48489
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. HICKS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HICKS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv35295
Plaintiff:
BRIAN J. HICKS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HICKS et al v. EAGLE-PICHER IND., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61592
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J. HICKS and SADIE HICKS
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER IND., INC. , NICOLET INDUSTRIES INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flynn et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03665
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Flynn , Milton Gautreaux , Joseph C. Guillard and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Shaw Environmental, Inc, North American Catastrophe Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
HICKS et al v. A C AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62489
Plaintiff:
TERRY J. HICKS, TERRY J. HICKS, TERRY J. HICKS and others
Defendant:
A C AND S, INC., A C AND S, INC., AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
