Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Charles Kennedy v. George Kelly
as 22-3087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES J. KENNEDY
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE V. KELLY
Russell May v. Eric Bradley, et al
as 20-1729
Defendant:
COUNSELOR M. NAGLIC, CASE MANAGER J. SPEILVOGEL, J. RICHARDSON, Trust Fund Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
Gregory Weedon v. Godlewski, et al
as 16-4350
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY WEEDON
Defendant - Appellee:
GODLEWSKI, Correctional Offices Sergeant, Individually and his Capacity, MARY CANINO, individually and her capacity, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, individually and his capacity and others
In re: Alton D. Brown
as 16-1546
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Respondent:
SHIRLEY SMEAL, DANIEL BURNS, TIMOTHY S. RINGLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT GILMORE and C.O. FRANK
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JAUN R. SANCHEZ
Patti Kennedy v. Wyeth LLC
as 14-2729
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATTI KENNEDY and ESTATE OF DENNIS J. KENNEDY
Defendant - Appellee:
WYETH LLC, AHP SETTLEMENT TRUST, PLAINTIFFS LIASON COUNSEL and others
Alfonso Pew v. C Garman, et al
as 12-3748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant - Appellee:
C GARMAN, Unit Manager, KOHLER, Lt., SUNDERLAND, Captain and others
Glendon Durham v. City of Sea Isle
as 08-3637
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GLENDON DURHAM, ANEQUA JOYCE and DORETHA WATERS-RICE
Defendant:
CITY OF SEA ISLE, SEA ISLE CTY BD OF ED, SEA ISLE CTY SCH and others
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM J. KENNEDY, individually, and in his official capacity as the Chief of the Sea Isle City, New Jersey, Police Department, and in his official capacity as the President of the Sea Isle City Board of Education
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
