Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MOORE v. KELLER et al
as 3:2021cv04841
Defendant:
TROOPER U BOYD and TROOPER J L KELLER
Plaintiff:
JAMES W MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SLACKFORD v. JAMISON et al
as 1:2020cv01846
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SLACKFORD
Defendant:
WARDEN J. L. JAMISON and MEDICAL STAFF FAIRTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EADS v. JAMISON
as 1:2019cv17564
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER JUSTIN EADS
Respondent:
J. L. JAMISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COMPOSITION ROOFERS LOCAL 10 PENSION FUND et al v. J & L ROOFING, INC et al
as 2:2019cv07359
Plaintiff:
ROOFERS UNION LOCAL 10, COMPOSITION ROOFERS LOCAL 10 APPRENTICE TRAINING FUND, NICK STRAUSS and others
Defendant:
J & L ROOFING, INC and FURIA ROOFING INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
CAMPBELL v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv08113
Plaintiff:
GERALD LYNN CAMPBELL
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DOUGHTY, F. OLMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORTON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv07888
Plaintiff:
TYRON MORTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PUJOLS v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2015cv04159
Plaintiff:
XIOMARAH PUJOLS
Defendant:
JAMES YOUNG , BENJAMIN D. JACKSON , J&L TRUCKING and others
Counter_claimant:
J&L TRUCKING and BENJAMIN D. JACKSON
Counter_defendant:
XIOMARAH PUJOLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COFFEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
JOHN COFFEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Norward
as 1:2014cv04468
Petitioner:
Edgar Spencer Phillips
Respondent:
J. L. Norward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
