Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Viglione vs. Dick J. Lee
as 1:2022cv10176
Plaintiff:
Keith Viglione and Dick J. Lee
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Charles Raso v. Denise J. Lee Sears
as 1:2021cv11876
Plaintiff:
Charles Raso
Defendant:
Denise J. Lee Sears
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 21-1085
Defendant:
MARK ARGIR, Correction Officer, FCI Berlin, KEVIN RAMSAY, Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, NH, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, NH, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Interested Party:
BRIAN PATTERSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Lee v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00172
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Bobby J. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 17-1292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Defendant:
MICHELLE GONYEA, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Ray Brook, f/k/a FNU Gaunyea, FNU KUZNECOW, (first name unknown) Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, K. LEWIS, Physician's Assistant, FCI Berlin and others
Defendant - Appellee:
E. L. TATUM, Warden, FCI Berlin, a/k/a Esker Lee Tatum, DAN SULLIVAN, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Berlin, WANDA MULLINS, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin and others
Interested Party:
BRIAN PATTERSON
Widi v. USA et al
as 1:2016fp00445
Defendant:
Mark Argir, Cory Balinas, B. Beegle and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Widi, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv10365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
HICA Education Loan Corporation v. Lee
as 1:2011cv11418
Plaintiff:
HICA Education Loan Corporation
Defendant:
Richard J. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
