Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Brogdon v. Baker et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Craig Bruce Brogdon
Defendant:
Unknown, M. Anthony Baker, John J. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12662
Plaintiff:
ANDREW J MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11465
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03019
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17142
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04458
Plaintiff:
BRYAN J. MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MARTIN v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00025
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J MARTIN
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv31175
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA J MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF FLORIDA INC v. LEE
as 4:2021cv00190
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF FLORIDA INC, FAIR VOTE FLORIDA, OUR VOTES MATTER and others
Defendant:
LAUREL LEE, JONI ALEXIS POITIER, KYMBERLEE CURRY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. FORD et al
as 5:2021cv00155
Defendant:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANT, DORM OFFICER SMITH, DORM OFFICER MANN and others
Plaintiff:
EDGAR J MARTIN, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
