Cases 1 - 10 of 11
OLIVER v. ARAMARK FOOD INC. et al
as 5:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
BRIAN C. OLIVER
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD INC., ARAMARK SUPERVISOR TASSONE, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. HARPER
as 2:2018cv00837
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J. MARTIN
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. MARTIN et al
as 3:2016cv00764
Plaintiff:
Gregory G. Brown
Defendant:
J. Martin, S. GAVLICK, MCNAULTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. MARTIN et al
as 2:2016cv01349
Plaintiff:
GREGORY G. BROWN
Defendant:
J. MARTIN, S. GAVLICK, MCNAULTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANWYK v. SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv01240
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL ROBERT VANWYK
Defendant:
SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, SALEM COUNTY, RAYMOND C. SKRADZINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Lamon et al
as 1:2013cv01977
Plaintiff:
John J. Martin
Defendant:
Thomas Lamon, Jason Vernon and Cathleen Hutchison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Addogoh et al
as 1:2013cv01735
Plaintiff:
John J. Martin
Defendant:
Addogoh, Kathleen Mateyahn and Amy R.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. ELWOOD et al
as 3:2012cv04022
Petitioner:
MATTHEW J. MARTIN
Respondent:
BRIAN ELWOOD, MONMOUTH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY FREEHOLD, NEW JERSEY, SCOTT A. WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RIVERA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2010cv00235
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFREY A. BEARD, TIMOTHY I. MARK and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Lawler
as 1:2009cv02332
Petitioner:
Thomas J Martin, Sr.
Respondent:
Raymond Lawler and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
