Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Mitchell et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20836
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Albert J. Mitchell and Faye A. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meeks et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2011cv01129
Plaintiff:
James M. Graham, Jr., Alexander J. Jacobs, Robert A. Mazzurana and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
MITCHELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2011cv00546
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY J MITCHELL and GARY R MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
MITCHELL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv45178
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. MITCHELL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MITCHELL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv39039
Plaintiff:
BILLY J. MITCHELL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JOHNSON V. MITCHELL
as 2:2011cv03194
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. JOHNSON and TAMEKA JOHNSON
Defendant:
ELLEN J. MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL et al v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv32991
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J. MITCHELL and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MITCHELL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53557
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J. MITCHELL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MITCHELL v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71924
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J MITCHELL
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AARSETH v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33253
Plaintiff:
BILLY J. MITCHELL and BILLY J. MITCHELL
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
