Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Ponce v. Wang et al
as 1:2015cv00620
Plaintiff:
Raul Ponce
Defendant:
Jeffrey Wang, Teresa Macias, Edgar Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A & B Campbell Family et al v. Chesakpeake Energy Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
A & B Campbell Family , Eugene J Barrett, Jr. , Lori R Barrett and others
Defendant:
Chesakpeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia,L.L.C., Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Andre Revis v. A. Enenmoh, et al
as 14-16107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE L. REVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
A. ENENMOH, Chief Medical Officer, CMO, J. WANG, Physician, Chief Medical Officer, CMO, E. CLARK, Physician, Chief Medical Officer, CMO and others
USA v. Ronald Moon
as 14-1562
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONALD J. MOON, a/k/a Ronald Johnson
R.J. Moon Inc. et al v. Iqbal Ashraf et al
as 2:2013cv06401
Defendant:
Iqbal Ashraf, Does, Mohammed Latif and others
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Moon and R.J. Moon Inc.
R J Moon Inc et al v. Iqbal Ashraf et al
as 2:2013cv05718
Defendant:
Iqbal Ashraf, Iqbal Ashraf, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Robert J Moon and R J Moon Inc
Raymond Bradford v. D. Castano, et al
as 13-16258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
D. CASTANO, H. NGUYEN, Dr., YU, Doctor and others
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. ELM BROOK INVESTMENTS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01627
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
ELM BROOK INVESTMENTS, INC., EARL L. MOON and SHIRLEY J. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Revis v. Salinas et al
as 1:2013at00013
Plaintiff:
Andre Revis
Defendant:
L Salinas , J Wang , A Enenmoh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Revis v. Salinas, et al.
as 1:2013cv00059
Plaintiff:
Andre Revis
Defendant:
L Salinas , J Wang , A Enenmoh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
