Cases 11 - 20 of 33
REYNOLDS v. ASTON et al
as 2:2018cv02351
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SCOTT REYNOLDS, JR.
Defendant:
RICHARD W. ASTON , CHARLES J MURRAY and ROBERT HEIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shade v. Mattersight Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00741
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Shade
Defendant:
Mattersight Corporation , Kelly D. Conway , Tench Coxe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
MURRAY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv11822
Plaintiff:
GLORIA J MURRAY and ANTHONY J MURRAY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ORTIZ v. MURRAY et al
as 3:2015cv08453
Plaintiff:
DENNIS J. ORTIZ
Defendant:
ROBERT J. MURRAY and NEW JERSEY STATE TROOPERS JOHN & JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. SOUSA et al
as 2:2013cv06038
Plaintiff:
RUDI ANDERSON
Defendant:
JOSE R. SOUSA and CHRISTOPHER J. MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.
as 3:2011cv02302
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Murray
Defendant:
Jeld-Wen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Universal Underwriters Insurance Company v. J. Murray Motor Co. et al
as 4:2011cv01851
Plaintiff:
Universal Underwriters Insurance Company
Defendant:
J. Murray Motor Co. and Murray Leasing
Counterclaim_plaintiff:
Murray Leasing and J. Murray Motor Co.
Counterclaim_defendant:
Universal Underwriters Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MURRAY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv50877
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J MURRAY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Murray v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00895
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Murray
Defendant:
Jeld-Wen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
DUBLISKY et al v. ADAMS AUTO PARTS, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv01480
Plaintiff:
KEITH DUBLISKY , MARK DUBLISKY and GLENN DUBLISKY
Defendant:
ADAMS AUTO PARTS, LLC , QUAKER CITY MOTOR ARTS CO. , NAPA AUTO PARTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
