Cases 21 - 30 of 121
Nash v. Princeton Excess & Surplus Lines Insurance Co
as 2:2021cv02672
Plaintiff:
Alce J Nash
Defendant:
The Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houston v. Dzurenada et al
as 2:2021cv01338
Plaintiff:
Brick P. Houston
Defendant:
James Dzurenada, Warden Brian Williams, J. Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Smith v. Aaron Ford, et al
as 21-16042
Defendant / Appellee:
C. DANIELS, S. MOYLE, AARON FORD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE T. SMITH
(PC) John E. Mooney v. Macias-Carrillo et al
as 1:2021cv00377
Defendant:
Macias-Carrillo, Green, S. Gates and others
Plaintiff:
John Edward Mooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratcliff v. Williams et al
as 2:2021cv00292
Plaintiff:
Evan Ratcliff
Defendant:
J. Nash and Warden Brian Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Brooks v. B. Williams, et al
as 21-15248
Defendant / Appellee:
J. NASH, A.W., RITZ, Caseworker and B. WILLIAMS, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN BROOKS
Carpenter v. Johnson et al
as 2:2020cv02175
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Charles Daniels and J. Nash
Plaintiff:
Ernest Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Jerome J. Nash et al
as 2:2020cv08786
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Anna Marie Wiggins and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
JEROME J. NASH, Trustee, STEVEN M. KATS, Trustee, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Ford et al
as 3:2020cv00501
Defendant:
St. Mary Shakayla, T. Sandoval, W. Gittere and others
Plaintiff:
Willie T. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston Jr v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2020cv01532
Defendant:
Thompson, Warden Brian Williams, Brawn Keyturner and others
Plaintiff:
Brick Pommeroy Houston Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
