Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Greene v. Douglas et al
as 2:2022cv12626
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Greene
Defendant:
Douglas, M. Godfrey, C. Walker and others
Ryan Diemond v. MDOC, et al
as 21-2769
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN CHARLES DIEMOND
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON, INC., RANDEE REWERTS, Warden and others
Fairley #297836 v. Fidler et al
as 1:2021cv00565
Plaintiff:
Lewis Fairley #297836
Defendant:
Unknown Fidler, Unknown Burns, A. Maiga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Salami v. J. Niemiec, et al
as 21-1370
Defendant / Appellee:
KHRIS NEVINS, ADW, J. NIEMIEC, PREA Coordinator and JOHN BEECHER, RUM
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MOHAMMED SALAMI, named as Paralegal Michael Mohamed Salami
Salami #879045 v. Niemiec et al
as 1:2020cv01100
Defendant:
J. Niemiec, Khris Nevins and John H. Beecher
Plaintiff:
Michael Salami #879045
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan Diemond v. MDOC, et al
as 20-1708
Defendant / Appellee:
J. NIEMIEC, Resident Unit Manager, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as unknown party of Corizon, CORIZON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN CHARLES DIEMOND
Diemond #703441 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00473
Defendant:
R. Rewerts, Corizon, J. Niemiec and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Charles Diemond #703441
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salami #879045 v. Washington et al
as 1:2020cv00107
Defendant:
R. Rewerts, J. Winger, L. Beecher and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Salami #879045
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feranec et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2017cv03942
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gerald R. Feranec , Patricia Crawford , Michael L. Hoskin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bonner v. WASHINGTON et al
as 2:2017cv11694
Plaintiff:
Brian Bonner
Defendant:
Shields, Lam, Webb and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
