Cases 1 - 10 of 23
BERRYMAN v. BOOKER et al
as 2:2015cv00227
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BERRYMAN
Defendant:
OFFICER BOOKER, OFFICER M. COX, CAPTAIN JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BROWN v. DR. WILSON et al
as 1:2015cv00224
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LYNN BROWN, Jr.
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS STAFF, J. F. CARAWAY, DR. MICKEY CHO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CROWDER v. LARIVA et al
as 2:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
RICKY CROWDER
Defendant:
HOLSTON, JONES, LARIVA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
LARD v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2014cv00038
Respondent:
J.F. CARAWAY and J. OLIVER
Petitioner:
ELLIS JEROME LARD, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
YISRA 'EL v. OLIVER
as 2:2013cv00344
Respondent:
J. OLIVER
Petitioner:
MEGED DAWVID YISRA 'EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FERNANDO v. CONWAY et al
as 2:2013cv00262
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Defendant:
H.G. CHURGH, J.F. CONWAY, J. OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
RILEY v. WARD et al
as 2:2013cv00146
Respondent:
ALL BUREAU OF PRISON EMPLOYEES, AMBER L. NELSON, J. OLIVER and others
Petitioner:
DANIEL JOHN RILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MUHAMMAD v. OLIVER
as 2:2013cv00144
Petitioner:
RASHID ABDUL-AZIZ MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
J. OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BUSTILLO v. SAMUELS, JR. et al
as 2:2013cv00120
Defendant:
J. BOATWRIGHT, C. BOYLL, J. F. CARAWAY and others
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WHITT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv00117
Respondent:
J. OLIVER and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
SAMUEL L. WHITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
