Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Pabon Gonzalez v. McArdle, Sandy et al
as 3:2019cv00443
Defendant:
J. Payne and Sandy McArdle
Not Yet Classified:
WSPF Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Pabon Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson, Wilson v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2019cv00366
Defendant:
J. Brown, Jill Dressler, Brad Hompe and others
Not Yet Classified:
WSPF Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Wilson Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Metzger, et al
as 1:2018cv00936
Petitioner:
Alonzo J. Payne
Respondent:
Dana Metzger and Matt Denn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill et al v. County of Niagara et al
as 6:2018cv06022
Plaintiff:
Michael Hill and Karen Pittman
Defendant:
County of Niagara, City of Niagara Falls, Caroline A. Wojtaszek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silas v. Rose et al
as 4:2017cv00628
Plaintiff:
Steve Silas
Defendant:
R. Rose and J. Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gipson, Kendall et al v. Litscher, Jon et al
as 3:2017cv00635
Plaintiff:
Kendall D. Gipson
Defendant:
Jon E. Litscher , Cathy Jess, Gary Boughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirkwood v. Payne et al
as 1:2015cv01471
Plaintiff:
Earnest Kirkwood
Defendant:
J Payne, McLean County Medical Staff, McLean County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Jackson v. David Willis, et al
as 14-3226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID WILLIS, Lieutenant, Prison Guard, Logan Correctional Center and EDDIE J. PAYNE, Prison Guard, Pinckneyville Prison
Nathaniel Jackson v. David Willis, et al
as 14-2658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID WILLIS, Lieutenant and EDDIE J. PAYNE
Nathaniel Jackson v. David Willis, et al
as 14-2589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID WILLIS, Lieutenant and EDDIE J. PAYNE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
