Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Deighan Law LLC, et al v. J. Gilbert
as 22-2083
Petitioner:
DEIGHAN LAW LLC, doing business as UpRight Law LLC and JAMES E. FORD
Respondent:
J. PHIL GILBERT
Interested Party:
NANCY J. GARGULA, BOYCE ALLEN BURNS, Debtor and AMANDA LANE BURNS, Debtor
Luke Prindable v. J. Phil Gilbert, et al
as 22-1315
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUKE A. PRINDABLE
Defendant / Appellee:
J. PHIL GILBERT, Magistrate Judge, USDC, TANYA KELLEY, Deputy Clerk, USDC, STEPHEN P. MCGLYNN, Magistrate Judge, USDC and others
Ahamad Atkins v. J. Gilbert, et al
as 21-3077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHAMAD R. ATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
J. PHIL GILBERT, PHILIP M. FRAZIER, JUDITH A. KUENNEKE and others
Atkins v. Gilbert et al
as 3:2021cv00489
Defendant:
Rodney H. Holmes, Judith A Kuenneke, Stephanie K Rennegarbe and others
Plaintiff:
Ahamad R Atkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Walter Sanders, Jr. v. J. Phil Gilbert
as 21-1349
Respondent:
J. PHIL GILBERT
Petitioner:
WALTER G. SANDERS, JR.
Akers v. Flannigan, et al
as 21-3019
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN SPROUL, Warden, SAM A. CROW, Federal judge, J. PHIL GILBERT, Federal judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Akers v. Flannigan et al
as 5:2020cv03311
Defendant:
Katherine Siereveld, Sarah Canty, Does Dental Department Employees and others
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Akers v. Gilbert et al
as 3:2020cv01096
Defendant:
1 - 12 Does, Katherine Siereveld, Kathy Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Stewart v. Southern District of Illinois
as 3:2020cv01090
Defendant:
Southern District of Illinois, J. Phil Gilbert, Staci M. Yandle and others
Plaintiff:
Derek Damean Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Akers v. Flannigan et al
as 5:2020cv03225
Defendant:
Kathy S. Hill, Sarah Canty, Kathryn H. Vratil and others
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
