Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Simmons v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv06214
Defendant:
Michael Kennedy, Michael Martin, Leroy K. Martin, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Simon Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Jackson v. James Linn, et al
as 18-2570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES B. LINN, Judge, THOMAS J. DART, DENNIS J. PORTER, Supervisor and others
Roberts v. Thompson et al
as 1:2018cv03296
Defendant:
Daniel J. Porter, Shannon Kulnis, Gwinnett County DA's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Kent Roberts, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Jackson v. James Linn, et al
as 18-2424
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES B. LINN, Judge, THOMAS J. DART, DENNIS J. PORTER, Supervisor and others
Anthony Jackson v. James Linn, et al
as 18-1977
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES B. LINN, Judge, THOMAS J. DART, DENNIS J. PORTER, Supervisor and others
Davis v. Lindsay et al
as 1:2018cv01875
Plaintiff:
Chinelo Jabari Davis
Defendant:
Coleman Lindsay, R.L. Butch Conway and Daniel J. Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swift Bey v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv00906
Plaintiff:
Blaane Marco Swift Bey
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Christopher M. Carr, Richard T. Hamil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Files v. King et al
as 1:2017cv01632
Plaintiff:
Earnest J Files, Jr
Defendant:
Julian M King, John Edward Rochester, Steven Dale Giddens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. SALEM COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2017cv05252
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL THOMAS
Defendant:
SALEM COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, J. PORTER, E. WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. McDonnell et al
as 6:2016cv06747
Plaintiff:
Jarvis J. Porter
Defendant:
T.J. McDonnell, John Doe and Gary Carpino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
