Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Chatman v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv03518
Plaintiff:
Chris B. Chatman
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Daniel J. Porter and Richard Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv03346
Plaintiff:
Howard Anderson Lee
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Ronnie K. Batchelor, Daniel J. Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wimbush v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv02883
Plaintiff:
Therian Wimbush
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Nathan Deal, Gwinnett County Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wimbush et al v. The State et al
as 1:2015cv02328
Plaintiff:
Therian Wimbush and Recardo Wimbush
Defendant:
The State, Nathan Deal, Gwinnett County Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Davis et al
as 1:2014cv03797
Petitioner:
Jorge Vasquez Padilla
Respondent:
Warren Davis, Daniel J. Porter, Jamie L. Smith, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Austin Smith v. Daniel Porter, et al
as 14-14204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUSTIN GARRICK SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL J. PORTER, KAREN WEST, KATHRYN M. SCHRADER and others
Clark et al v. Porter et al
as 1:2014cv02128
Plaintiff:
Jason Joseph Clark and Tamah Jada Clark
Defendant:
Daniel J. Porter, Nathan Deal, Thomas Davis, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOREY et al v. STEWART et al
as 4:2014cv00299
Plaintiff:
LAURA D STOREY and FRANK J PORTER
Defendant:
BENJAMIN J STEWART and BRAD JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Porter et al
as 1:2014cv00276
Plaintiff:
Austin Garrick Smith
Defendant:
Daniel J. Porter, Karen West, Kathryn M. Schrader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochard v. Gwinnett County et al
as 1:2012cv02648
Plaintiff:
Darnell Rochard
Defendant:
Gwinnett County, Dawson Jackson, Daniel J. Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
