Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Omar Folk v. BOP, et al
as 22-3078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OMAR SIERRE FOLK
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Employee's and Medical Staff and DAVID J. BALL
Defendant:
T. ANDRESS, JOHN T. BURN, C. CAIN and others
Omar Folk v. BOP, et al
as 21-1543
Defendant / Appellee:
A. RODERMEL, NICK MAIZE, T. THOMAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OMAR SIERRE FOLK
Dinkins v. Potope et al
as 4:2019cv01460
Defendant:
J. Potope, Captain Hall, Brian Buschman, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
James Dinkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sonin v. Potope et al
as 3:2018cv01221
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Sonin
Defendant:
J. Potope, R. Parkyn, Elizabeth Stahl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mitchell Wall, et al v. Neylon, et al
as 16-3637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MITCHELL WALL
Defendant - Appellee:
NEYLON, Counselor, DR. BRIAN BUSHMAN and J. POTOPE, A.H.A
Mitchell Wall v. Brian Bushman, et al
as 15-1605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MITCHELL WALL
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. BRIAN BUSHMAN, J. POTOPE, A.H.A. and NEYLON, Counselor
Francis v. Fuller et al
as 3:2014cv01248
Plaintiff:
Freddie Francis, Jr.
Defendant:
B. Fuller, M. Kubicki, E. Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wall v. Bushman et al
as 3:2012cv02112
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Wall
Defendant:
Brian Bushman, J. Potope, Neylon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Patterson v. Potope et al
as 4:2011cv00497
Plaintiff:
David Patterson
Defendant:
J. Potope, J. Holtzapple, J. Bennett-Meehan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Meyers v. U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2011cv00173
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Eric Holder, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
