Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Esperon v. Bordallo
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
James J. Esperon
Defendant:
Fred Bordallo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Department of the Navy et al
as 1:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Center For Biological Diversity and Prutehi Litekyan: Save Ritidian
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Navy, Lloyd J. Austin, III, U.S. Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Philips v. Berman et al
as 1:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
MD Sherif A. Philips
Defendant:
Michael Berman and Daniel J. Berman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clervrain et al v. Anderson et al
as 1:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Fabrice Thomas, Evans Delva and others
Defendant:
S. Thomas Anderson, Joann Garcia Camacho, Melanie Mendiola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cruz v. Cruz
as 1:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Fred J. Cruz
Defendant:
Peter Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Goldsorough v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00028
Plaintiff:
Ashley M Goldsorough, Weston Goldsborough, Hannah M. Goldsborough and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Cruz v. Wolff
as 1:2021cv00018
Plaintiff:
Fred J. Cruz
Defendant:
Delia S.L. Wolff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raidoo et al v. Camacho, et al.
as 1:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Arthur San Agustin, Antonio Rapadas, Nathaniel Berg and others
Plaintiff:
Bliss Kaneshiro and Shandhini Raidoo
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Esperon v. Carbullido
as 1:2020cv00027
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph Carbullido
Plaintiff:
James J. Esperon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Felder v. Brennan et al
as 1:2019cv00140
Defendant:
Mae M. Quitugua, Marceline U. Maratita, Cathy M. Cruz and others
Plaintiff:
Dominick Lamar Felder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
