Cases 21 - 30 of 85
USA v. Emmanuel Taylor
as 20-1015
Defendant / Appellant:
EMMANUEL J. TAYLOR
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Daniel Matthews v. Debra Hascall, et al
as 19-35949
Defendant:
CITY OF PENDLETON, COUNTY OF UMATILLA, OR, Individually and in their official capacities
Defendant / Appellee:
J. PECK, Assistant Superintendent at EOCI, MITCH MORROW, Deputy Director of ODOC, RILEY, Correctional Officer at EOCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL J. MATTHEWS
Klein v. Taylor et al
as 2:2019cv00816
Defendant:
Christopher J. Taylor and Energizing Concepts
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Klein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Robert Winburn v. Darlene O'Brien, et al
as 19-2085
Defendant / Appellee:
DARLENE A. O'BRIEN, 22nd Circuit Court Judge and ALEXANDRIA J. TAYLOR, Michigan Indigent Defense Commission
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT WINBURN
Craig Ross, et al v. P. White, et al
as 19-55900
Defendant / Appellee:
BARRY PASTERNACK, MONIQUE SHAY, FRAMROZE M. VIRJEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG ROSS and NATALIE OPERSTEIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Taylor v. Medeiros
as 19-1552
Petitioner / Appellant:
RODRICK J. TAYLOR
Respondent / Appellee:
SEAN MEDEIROS, Superintendant and SEAN MEDEIROS, Superintendent
William Guy v. Pedro J. Pizarro et al
as 2:2019cv00693
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Company, James T. Morris, Richard T. Schlosberg III and others
Plaintiff:
William Guy
Stan Kieffer v. Pedro Pizarro et al
as 2:2019cv00651
Defendant:
James T. Morris, Maria Rigatti, Michael C. Camunez and others
Plaintiff:
Stan Kieffer
Consolidated Plaintiff:
William Guy
USA v. Janice Taylor, et al
as 18-10193
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JANICE SUE TAYLOR, AKA Sue J. Taylor
Movant - Appellant:
RONALD J. MCBRIDE and DESIREE E. SAUNDERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
