Cases 1 - 6 of 6
John Alexander v. B. Myers, et al
as 24-1239
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALEXANDER
Defendant:
B. MYERS, Corrections Lieutenant- SCI Smithfield, SPECK, Corrections Lieutenant SCI-Smithfield, WISER, Corrections Lieutenant SCI-Smithfield and others
Gunn v. Abrunzo
as 22-971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell Gunn
Defendant / Appellee:
Chad Bescler, Correction Officer, Jeffery Claflin, Sergeant, Timothy Perry, Correction Officer and others
Defendant:
William J. Abrunzo, Inmate Grievance Program, Supervisor, Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner, R.J. Ballard, Lieutenant and others
DePonceau v. United States of America
as 14-2253
Defendant:
K. Hollenbeck, Elmira Correctional Facility, Patrick Crough, Investigator, Hiver, Lieutenant and others
Appellee:
Michael Zeigiller, Reporter, David T. Moore, Rochester Police Chief, Robert J. Lunn, Appellate Division and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Altheus DePonceau
DePonceau v. United States of America
as 14-14
Defendant:
K. Hollenbeck, Elmira Correctional Facility, Patrick Crough, Investigator, Hiver, Lieutenant and others
Appellee:
Michael Zeigiller, Reporter, David T. Moore, Rochester Police Chief, Robert J. Lunn, Appellate Division and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Altheus DePonceau
DePonceau v. United States of America
as 12-1485
Defendant:
K. Hollenbeck, Elmira Correctional Facility, Patrick Crough, Investigator, Hiver, Lieutenant and others
Appellee:
Michael Zeigiller, Reporter, David T. Moore, Rochester Police Chief, Robert J. Lunn, Appellate Division and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Altheus DePonceau
DePonceau v. United States of America
as 10-3762
Defendant:
K. Hollenbeck, Elmira Correctional Facility, Patrick Crough, Investigator, Hiver, Lieutenant and others
Appellee:
Michael Zeigiller, Reporter, David T. Moore, Rochester Police Chief, Robert J. Lunn, Appellate Division and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Altheus DePonceau
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
