Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00341
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Golbert et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv00300
Plaintiff: Charles Golbert, J. B., K. J. and others
Defendant: Marc D. Smith, Debra Dyer-Webster, Beverly J. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DURBIN v. PELOSI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03222
Plaintiff: JOHN PAUL DURBIN
Defendant: NANCY PATRICIA PELOSI, CHARLES ELLIS SCHUMER, ADDISON MITCHELL MCCONNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Andrew Clyde, et al v. William Walker, et al
as 22-5263
Plaintiff / Appellant: Andrew S. Clyde, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, Louie Gohmert, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives and Lloyd Smucker, Individually, and in his Official Capacity as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives
Defendant / Appellee: William J. Walker, In his Official Capacity as Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives and Catherine Szpindor, In her Official Capacity as Chief Administrative Officer of the U.S. House of Representatives
Patrick Mahoney v. United States Capitol Police Board, et al
as 22-5094
Plaintiff / Appellant: Patrick J. Mahoney, Reverend
Defendant / Appellee: United States Capitol Police Board, in its Official Capacity, Karen H. Gibson, in her Official Capacity as U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper and Chair, Capitol Police Board, William J. Walker, in his Official Capacity as U.S. House of Representatives Sergeant at Arms and Member, Capitol Police Board and others
MAHONEY v. UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00760
Plaintiff: Reverend PATRICK J. MAHONEY and PATRICK J. MAHONEY
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD, KAREN H. GIBSON, WILLIAM J. WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thomas Massie, et al v. Nancy Pelosi, et al
as 22-5058
Plaintiff / Appellant: Thomas Massie, Hon., In his official and individual capacities, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Hon., In her official and individual capacities and Ralph Norman, Hon., In his official and individual capacities
Defendant / Appellee: Nancy Pelosi, Hon., In her official capacity only, William J. Walker, In his official capacity as Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives and Catherine Szpindor, In her official capacity as Chief Admin. Officer of the U.S. House of Representatives
O'Rourke, et al v. Dominion Voting Systems, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1442
Plaintiff: KEVIN O'ROURKE, NATHANIEL L. CARTER, LORI CUTUNILLI and others
Defendant / Appellee: DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation, CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE and others
Defendant: MARK E. ZUCKERBERG, individually, PRISCILLA CHAN, individually, BRIAN KEMP, individually and others
Appellant: GARY D. FIELDER and ERNEST J. WALKER
Rolston et al v. Robinson-Coffee et al
as 3:2021cv00888
Plaintiff: Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant: Tracey Robinson-Coffee, Dianne Turner, Estate of William Faimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
O'Rourke, et al v. Dominion Voting Systems, et al
as 21-1394
Plaintiff: KEVIN O'ROURKE, NATHANIEL L. CARTER, LORI CUTUNILLI and others
Defendant / Appellee: DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation, CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE and others
Defendant: MARK E. ZUCKERBERG, individually, PRISCILLA CHAN, individually, BRIAN KEMP, individually and others
Appellant: GARY D. FIELDER and ERNEST J. WALKER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?