Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Burrell et al v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell, Tyler Bly, Joshua Clamp and others
Defendant:
David Anderson, A. King, J. West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Rhode Island Office of The General Treasurer v. The Boeing Company et al
as 1:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
State of Rhode Island Office of The General Treasurer, on Behalf of The Employees' Retirement System of The State of Rhode Island and State of Rhode Island Office of the General Treasurer
Defendant:
The Boeing Company, David L. Calhoun, Dennis A. Muilenburg and others
Burrell v. Anderson et al
as 7:2023cv00820
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell
Defendant:
David Anderson, A. King, J. West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberson v. Davis et al
as 7:2020cv00280
Defendant:
K. J. West, H. R. Sims, R. Northrup and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence LeVone Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Howard
as 1:2014cv01522
Plaintiff:
Marcellina J. West
Defendant:
Tanya Watson Rainey Howard and Nathan A. Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
West-Bey v. Wallace et al
as 2:2010cv00121
Plaintiff:
Jerome J. West-Bey
Defendant:
Carol F. Wallace, Mr. Graham and Mr. Chai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. Mathena
as 7:2007cv00567
Petitioner:
Jerome J. West Bey
Respondent:
R. C. Mathena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bey v. Mathena
as 2:2007cv00545
Petitioner:
Jerome J. West Bey
Respondent:
R. C. Mathena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
West v. Braxton et al
as 7:2007cv00474
Plaintiff:
Jerome J. West
Defendant:
D. A. Braxton, A. Kelley Harrison and Naseer Mobashar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
