Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Jonassen v. Jacquez, et al.
as 24-2334
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN
Defendant:
I. JACQUEZ, D. SUH, B. CRAY and others
Wright v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2023cv01315
Plaintiff:
Beverly J. Wright
Defendant:
State of Oregon and Jodie A. Bureta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
S. Wellons, et al v. PNS Stores, Inc., et al
as 23-55665
Plaintiff / Appellee:
S. WELLONS, C. ARREDONDO, S. DAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
PNS STORES, INC., a California corporation and BIG LOTS STORES, INC., an Ohio Corporation
William Wright v. Airway Heights Correction Center MSU, et al
as 22-36057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM J WRIGHT, a single person
Defendant / Appellee:
AIRWAY HEIGHTS CORRECTION CENTER MSU, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DON MCINTYRE, health services manager 2 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Young et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2021cv10006
Plaintiff:
Alan R. Young, Alberta Edwards, Allyscia D. Roseman-Frazer and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
(PC) McDowell v. Flores et al
as 1:2021cv01710
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dewitt McDowell
Defendant:
R. Flores, V. Barboza, A. Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyde-Rhodes v. Withers et al
as 4:2021cv00335
Plaintiff:
Kim Hyde-Rhodes
Defendant:
Mark Withers, Dave Johnson, John Stosich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen Hammler v. J. Wright
as 21-15881
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLEN HAMMLER
Defendant / Appellee:
J. WRIGHT
S. Wellons, et al v. PNS Stores, Inc., et al
as 21-80007
Petitioner:
N. LOPEZ, J. SMITH, T. SELTZER and others
Respondent:
BIG LOTS STORES, INC., an Ohio Corporation and PNS STORES, INC., a California corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
