Cases 1 - 10 of 95
USA v. Brandon Yates
as 22-30051
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRANDON J. YATES
William Rouser v. Theo White, et al
as 22-55139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM ROUSER
Defendant / Appellee:
THEO WHITE, JAMES GOMEZ, Director of Corrections, J. YATES and others
Defendant:
E. W. MEADS, Protestant Chaplain, JACK R. REAGAN, Chief Inmate Appeal and JAMES E. TILTON
Constitution Association, Inc., et al v. Kamala Harris
as 21-56287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONSTITUTION ASSOCIATION, INC., by its founders, GEORGE F.X. ROMBACH, DOUGLAS V. GIBBS and others
Plaintiff:
B. GREEN, R. HANDY, A. HURLEY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS
William Rouser v. Theo White, et al
as 20-56349
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN HAWS, MATTHEW CATE, B. FLORES, Correctional Counselor I and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM ROUSER
Defendant:
JAMES E. TILTON, JACK R. REAGAN, Chief Inmate Appeal and E. W. MEADS, Protestant Chaplain
Constitution Association, Inc. et al v. Harris
as 3:2020cv02379
Plaintiff:
R. Kowell, C. Mongiello, George F.X. Rombach and others
Defendant:
Kamala Devi Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 an
Yates v. United States
as 5:2019cv06384
Defendant:
United States
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Yates
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7431
William Rouser v. Theo White, et al
as 18-55642
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM ROUSER
Defendant - Appellee:
THEO WHITE, JAMES GOMEZ, Director of Corrections, J. YATES and others
Michael Yates v. USA
as 17-17051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. YATES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Green v. Beard et al
as 1:2017at00589
Plaintiff:
Lance Green
Defendant:
J Beard , J Brown , M Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Beard et al
as 1:2017cv01027
Plaintiff:
Lance Green
Defendant:
J Beard , J Brown , M Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
