Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Embrey v. Sepanek et al
as 0:2014cv00040
Petitioner:
William J.R. Embrey
Respondent:
Michael Sepanek and Federal Government, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Embrey v. Sepanek
as 0:2013cv00133
Petitioner:
William J.R. Embrey
Respondent:
M. Sepanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Embrey v. Sepanek et al
as 0:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
William J.R. Embrey
Defendant:
M. Sepanek, Brian Sparks, Karl Leibee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Embrey v. United States of America et al
as 0:2013cv00020
Petitioner:
William J.R. Embrey
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Attorney General and Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Defendant:
M. Sepanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Embrey v. Holland
as 0:2011cv00119
Petitioner:
William J.R. Embrey
Respondent:
J. C. Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Embrey v. Holland
as 0:2011cv00047
Plaintiff:
William J.R. Embrey
Defendant:
J. C. Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WHM Mineral Holdings, LLC v. Bocook Engineering, Inc et al
as 7:2009cv00157
Plaintiff:
WHM Mineral Holdings, LLC and WHM Mineral Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Bocook Engineering, Inc. and J.R. Salyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Embrey v. Cauley
as 0:2009cv00078
Petitioner:
William J.R. Embrey
Respondent:
E. K. Cauley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roberts et al v. Fitzgerald et al
as 3:2009cv00681
Plaintiff:
Ronald Roberts, J.R., B.R. and others
Defendant:
Patricia Walker Fitzgerald, Peggy Kennitez, Robert Brill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
