Cases 1 - 10 of 218
Cain v. Jackson Public School District
as 3:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Jsh'Nice Cain
Defendant:
Jackson Public School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Merritt et al v. Hamilton-Ryker IT Solutions, LLC
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Brad Merritt, Billy Cunningham, Daniel Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Hamilton-Ryker IT Solutions, LLC
Jackson et al v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Andrea Jackson, Gerad Jackson and Andrea Michelle Betscher
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and Fidelity Workplace Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Voyles v. Superior Staffing
as 23-30920
Plaintiff:
William Voyles, individually and for others similarly situated, Josh Cartledge, Michael Kucik and others
Defendant:
Superior Staffing, L.L.C., Superior Disaster Relief, L.L.C. and Scott Butaud
Jones v. Hughes et al
as 5:2023cv01686
Plaintiff:
Jackson Jones
Defendant:
Bobby Hughes, Police Jury Sabine Parish and X Y Z
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Hughes et al
as 1:2023cv01686
Plaintiff:
Jackson Jones
Defendant:
Bobby Hughes, Police Jury Sabine Parish and X Y Z
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dossett v. Sysco Jackson, LLC
as 5:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Lyman Dossett
Defendant:
Sysco Jackson, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jackson et al v. Bruno Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv05065
Plaintiff:
Jasheika Jackson and Wanya Major
Defendant:
Bruno Inc., Joshua Bruno, MW Servicing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 fi Fair Labor Standards Act
Jackson v. PDI Technologies Inc
as 3:2023cv01847
Plaintiff:
Robert Jackson
Defendant:
PDI Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Jackson v. Clay Cooley
as 23-10852
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pierro Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
Clay Cooley, L.L.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
