Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Alexander Jacobson v. Darrel Vannoy, et al
as 17-30239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER JACOBSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, MATTHEWS, Lieutenant Colonel and KENNETH BOOTY, Assistant Warden
Jacobson v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2017cv01503
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Gregory Longino and Leon A. Cannizzaro
Plaintiff:
David O Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jacobson v. Vannoy
as 3:2015cv00783
Plaintiff:
Alexander Jacobson
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Denson v. Stevens et al
as 5:2015cv00146
Plaintiff:
Tommie J Denson
Defendant:
Robert K Stevens, Roberto Villalpando , Jr., Marion O Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Jacobson v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 11-30098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID JACOBSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M LEBLANC, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, Municipal Entity, HOWARD PRINCE and others
Kamal Patel v. Ronald Thompson, et al
as 10-11061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL PATEL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH HARO, Warden - FCI Big Spring, W. A. SHERROD, Associate Warden, TREVINO TAPIA, Associate Warden and others
Jacobson v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2010cv00251
Defendant:
Laterda Drummon, Robert Henderson, James LeBlanc and others
Plaintiff:
David Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobson v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2010cv00112
Plaintiff:
David Jacobson
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
