Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Blanco et al v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2020cv01093
Plaintiff:
Clearchus Jamar McCreight, Nashid Fuad Ibn Mateen and David Aucencio Blanco
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Unknown Parties and Robert M Brutinel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCreight v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2020cv01113
Plaintiff:
Clearchus Jamar McCreight
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Robert M Brutinel and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James #161874 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv05002
Defendant:
R Montes, J McAdorey, Jennifer Barraza and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Jamar James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00150
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James #161874 v. Arizona Department of Corrections
as 2:2018cv04545
Respondent:
Arizona Department of Corrections and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Jason Jamar James
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pouncey v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv00820
Plaintiff:
Touche Jamar Pouncey
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Inmate Legal Services, C Lillie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pouncey v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv00723
Plaintiff:
Touche Jamar Pouncey
Defendant:
Unknown Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bank of America NA
as 2:2016cv04410
Plaintiff:
Jamar Johnson
Defendant:
Bank of America NA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
James #161874 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv02515
Plaintiff:
Jason Jamar James
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Fay, Unknown Fransico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James #161874 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01794
Plaintiff:
Jason Jamar James
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Rieffer, J Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
