Cases 1 - 10 of 16
(PC) Johnson v. Young et al
as 2:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
James Edward Johnson
Defendant:
Young and O'Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2022cv01905
Plaintiff:
James Scott Johnson
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Josh Highberger, Marica G. Ventura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Johnson, III v. Ron Haynes, et al
as 22-35885
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES L JOHNSON III
Defendant / Appellee:
RON HAYNES, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center, ROB SCHREIBER, Correctional Program Manager, Stafford Creek Corrections Center, GINA PENROSE, Associate Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center and others
Johnson v. Haynes et al
as 3:2022cv05492
Plaintiff:
James L Johnson, III
Defendant:
Ron Haynes, Rob Schreiber, Gina Penrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James R. Johnson v. L. J. Milusnic
as 2:2018cv08534
Petitioner:
James R. Johnson
Respondent:
Warden L. J. Milusnic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson
as 2:2018cv00048
Petitioner:
James Earl Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Enriquez v. Madsen et al
as 3:2015cv05065
Plaintiff:
Hector Perez Enriquez
Defendant:
Barbara Madsen, Mary Fairhurst, Susan Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Entler v. Justice Gary Alexander, et al
as 10-35989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN THOMAS ENTLER
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTICE GARY L. ALEXANDER, JAMES M. JOHNSON, Administrative Law Judge, BARBARA MADSEN, Administrative Law Judge and others
James Johnson v. Melissa Lea
as 10-17281
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES M. JOHNSON, Administrative Law Judge
Respondent - Appellee:
MELISSA LEA
Entler v. Van Deren et al
as 3:2010cv05390
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Entler
Defendant:
Marywave Van Deren, Steven Goff, Gary L Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
