Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America v. Jones, Sr., James et al
as 3:2012cv00237
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Vincent Jones, Sr. and Michelle Louise Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JONES, SR. v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67437
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. JONES, SR.
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES SR. et al v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, PABCO INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIV.
as 2:2011cv66894
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. JONES SR. and JAQUELINE L. JONES
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, PABCO INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIV.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parsons et al v. Koppers Inc. f/k/a Koppers Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00071
Plaintiff:
Maria Parsons , Michael Parsons , Mary Ann Jones and others
Defendant:
Koppers Inc. f/k/a Koppers Industries, Inc., Cabot Corporation and BEAZER EAST, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Jones, Sr., et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 09-56807
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES H. JONES, Sr.
Plaintiff:
AUDRAE R. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANTONIO VILARAIGOSA, Mayor of Los Angeles and others
Jones et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2009cv03162
Plaintiff:
Audrae R. Jones and James H Jones, Sr
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles Police Department, Antonio Vilaraigosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
JONES v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74895
Plaintiff:
JAMES HAROLD JONES, SR.
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JONES v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv68525
Plaintiff:
JAMES FRANK JONES, SR.
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
