Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BARRETT v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv02823
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY P. BARRETT
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, BARACK OBAMA and others
Claimant:
NANCY PELOSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
KAVANAGH v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv02163
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, MARK T. ESPER, JOHN DOES 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
ISABELLA KAVANAGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ROTH v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv01622
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, WILLIAM J. WALKER, JAMES C. MCCONVILLE and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN ROTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv01620
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, JOHN POES (1-100), WILLIAM J. WALKER and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN ROTH and NO PARTY
Not Classified By Court:
JAMES C. MCCONVILLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BLACK LIVES MATTER D.C. et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv01469
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, WILLIAM J. WALKER, JAMES C. MCCONVILLE and others
Plaintiff:
GARRETT BOND, J.N.C., KISHON MCDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 a-3
SINGH et al v. MCCONVILLE et al
as 1:2016cv00581
Plaintiff:
KANWAR BIR SINGH , HARPAL SINGH and SATWINDER SINGH
Defendant:
JAMES C. MCCONVILLE , DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , ASHTON B. CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SINGH v. CARTER et al
as 1:2016cv00399
Plaintiff:
SIMRATPAL SINGH
Defendant:
ASHTON B. CARTER , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , PATRICK J. MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SINGH v. MCHUGH et al
as 1:2014cv01906
Defendant:
JOHN MCHUGH , JAMES C. MCCONVILLE , PEGGY C. COMBS and others
Plaintiff:
IKNOOR SINGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
