Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Davis v. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2022cv00321
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Defendant:
State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jones v. Johnson et al
as 4:2019cv03058
Defendant:
Sharmara Stephens, St. Louis City Children's Divison, Jacita Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Davis v. Mac's Convenience Stores LLC d/b/a Circle K
as 4:2019cv01689
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Defendant:
Mac's Convenience Stores LLC d/b/a Circle K and Mac's Convenience Stores LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Airgas USA, LLC
as 6:2018cv03331
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Defendant:
Airgas USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Dunham's Athleisure Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv01782
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Defendant:
Dunham's Athleisure Corporation and Century International Arms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Dunham's Athleisure Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00271
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Defendant:
Dunham's Athleisure Corporation and Century International Arms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rose et al v. Silverleaf Resorts, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00695
Defendant:
Silverleaf Resorts, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Rose , Henny Rose , James Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. Dicus
as 1:2013cv00106
Plaintiff:
Fredrick James Davis
Defendant:
Margaret Dicus and Mississippi County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Frederick
as 4:2013cv00793
Plaintiff:
Fredrick James Davis
Defendant:
Unknown Frederick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Wallace et al
as 1:2012cv00198
Plaintiff:
Fredrick James Davis
Defendant:
Ian Wallace, Cheryl Thompson, Cynthia Resse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
