Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Daker v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv05243
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Cobb County Superior Court, Christopher Michael Carr and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lawson et al
as 2:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Alton W. Brown
Defendant:
Michael Lawson, John Roberts, Debra Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harper v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv01763
Plaintiff:
James Shivers Harper
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, James E. Donald, Brian Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendoza v. Donald et al
as 1:2016cv01471
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Mendoza
Defendant:
James E. Donald, Albert R. Murray, L. Gale Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry et al v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv04255
Plaintiff:
Freeman Berry
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Deborah C. Benefield, Bonnie Kay Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daker v. Deal et al
as 1:2014cv03856
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Brian Kemp, Samuel Olens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Crews, et al
as 6:2014cv01783
Plaintiff:
Stanley Dickerson
Defendant:
Michael Crews, Michael Moore, Carol J. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harwood v. Donald et al
as 1:2014cv00592
Plaintiff:
Phillip Anthony Harwood
Defendant:
James E. Donald, Terry E. Barnard, Albert R. Murry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2013cv04276
Plaintiff:
Robert Hill
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles, James E. Donald, Albert R. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Windelberg v. Deal et al
as 1:2013cv02606
Plaintiff:
Edwin Windelberg
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Ga. Pardons & Paroles Members, Albert R. Murray and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
