Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Damron v. Harris et al
as 4:2020cv00813
Defendant:
Julie Loomis, Annette Chambers-Smith, David S. Ritz and others
Plaintiff:
James E. Damron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Heid et al v. Marbley et al
as 2:2020cv01512
Defendant:
Circuit Judge Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judge Karen Nelson Moore, District Judge Algenon L. Marbley and others
Plaintiff:
James E. Damron and Ray Scott Heid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heid et al v. Aderholt et al
as 2:2020cv00901
Defendant:
Mrs. Wright, Mr./Mrs. Rosengarten, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
James E. Damron and Ray Scott Heid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heid et al v. Mohr et al
as 2:2018cv00311
Plaintiff:
Ray Scott Heid and James E. Damron
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Roger Wilson, Trevor Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Heid et al v. Hooks et al
as 2:2017cv00650
Plaintiff:
Ray Scott Heid and James E Damron
Defendant:
Mark Hooks and Jeffrey Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damron et al v. Dodrill et al
as 2:2017cv00337
Plaintiff:
James E Damron and Ray Scott Heid
Defendant:
Len Dodrill, Eric Graves, Melody Haskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Christian Separatist Church Society of Ohio; The Wife of Christ, Prosopopoeia et al v. The Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv02757
Plaintiff:
The Christian Separatist Church Society of Ohio; The Wife of Christ, Prosopopoeia, Ray S. Heid, Raymond R. Wolf, II and others
Defendant:
The Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Gary C Mohr, Michael Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damron et al v. Sims
as 2:2009cv00050
Plaintiff:
James E Damron, Billy J McClurg, Roger Green and others
Defendant:
Gary Sims
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Damron v. Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 2:2009cv00094
Petitioner:
James E. Damron
Respondent:
Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
